8 Comments to “Afghanistan: What’s next?”

1. hans 6 February 2010 at 17:18 #

   whatever reasons and excuses given by the American
   and it Western allies(NATO)for the war in Afghanistan and Iraq such as war against terror,to free the peoples of that country from dictatorship and to install democracy and so on bla bla bla….The real truth was these wars are actually a NEW FACE OF COLONIALISM led by the American and the Zionist.
   The purpose is for economic,expansion of influence and controls of strategic areas and resources and to pose threats to others who does not submit to the invaders requests and policies.
   So,an American Boy George started it,hoping to be remembered as American hero,a true RAMBO and one day remembered by the Western history as Richard The Lion Heart.A NEW FACE OF COLONIALISM.

   Reply
2. Denver DUI Attorney 26 December 2009 at 02:53 #

   I am agree with the writer that many people are killed in Iraq,Afghanistan and I million in Bosnia; I million if Chachekni.What is next target.

   Reply
3. Sham Seyd 24 November 2009 at 11:37 #

   I fully agree with Phil Edinburg and Sharpnel when they say,
   ‘The reason why most people in Europe have lost trust in their politicians and in institutions like NATO and the EU is becuase of the hypocritical leaders. Who simply have double standards and are dishonest in applying the rule of law depending on which country is being considered.’

   And More death, more poverty and more war´s dogs good business.

   This is because most of the people of the West are Ignorant UNBELIEVERS who don’t believe in God.

   You have killed imillion in Iraq; I million in Bosnia; I million if Chachekni.

   It is a cowardly act trying to reduce Muslinm population. All I can say is God will punish the mischief makers and we know who is behind all this. Just wait and see. Everyone will be six feet under the ground and then mischief makers will surely be punished. Believe it or not but my duty is to inform all ignorant hypocrites.

   Reply
4. danniger 7 November 2009 at 02:33 #

   La nouvelle donne qui se profile à l’horizon me semble compliquer la tâche de l’OTAN en Afganistan. En dépit des assurances données par le SG, des incertitudes subsistent avec le renoncement de Abdullah Abdullah de se présenter au second tour. Si la reconstruction du pays requiert l’adhésion d’une majorité d’afghans, il y a fort à parier qu’il faut encore du temps pour amener les partisans de ce candidat à accepter son abandon au point de collaborer. A mon avis, les experts et diplomates de l’OTAN et la communauté internationale ont encore du pain sur la planche pour faire en sorte que les mécontents de tous les bords n’aillent pas grossir les rangs des talibans. J’ai bien peur que même un gouvernement de large ouverture ne soit mal accueilli par beaucoup d’irréductibles.

   Reply
5. Xaliq Mustafayev 5 November 2009 at 17:18 #

   The NATO for today the unique organisation of support of peaceful co-existence of the people in the world. Double standards of the NATO which are applied to various leaders it is necessity for soil creation to the future democrats. The policy is not among the exact sciences and consequently it is necessary to apply sometimes a principle – to endow smaller for reception big.

   Reply
6. sharpnel 5 November 2009 at 14:24 #

   What´s Next? The answer is simple.More death, more poverty and more war´s dogs good business.

   Reply
7. derenj 5 November 2009 at 11:06 #

   ISAF OPLAN has been developed on several assumptions. Prerequisite for required Force posture is presence of full spectrum capabilities required to conduct CJTF operation and accomplish desired military and political end state. Publicly are well known – so called “national caveats” and inadequate to tasks “national contingents’ ROEs” which are “bad factors” and hamper ISAF Commander in OPLAN execution as well as limits his DMP and, finally crates huge gaps in capabilities sought for mission accomplishment in line with LOs. Has HQ NATO any reliable concept to use any military or political mechanism to reduce to the minimum these bed factors? Are all NATO and NNTCN troops (HQs) have achieved FOC and are capable to implement results of effects – based thinking OPP and use CDSS Tools necessary to conducts 4 block operation and counter and defeat asymmetric threat?
   Jerzy DEREN Col(R) PL A Dr Eng

   Reply
8. Phil1Edinburgh 5 November 2009 at 10:12 #

   I think that most people in countries belonging to NATO wonder why NATO is staying in AFghanistan. When President Mugabe of Zimbabwe was reelected after ‘fixing’ the election ballots his government has rightly been condemned and sanctions imposed.
   When Psident Krazi’s government does exactly the same if not more fraud then it is congratualted by NATO, the UN NATO’s Secretary Genral and many of our governments.

   The reason why most people in Europe have lost trust in their politicians and in institutions like NATO and the EU is becuase fo the hypocritical leaders. Who simply have double standards and are dishonest in applying the rule of law depending onwhich country is being connsidered.

   Reply

Leave a Reply