Comments for Secretary General's Corner

Comment on Security in the Gulf and the Mediterranean matters to NATO by Huaichun Jiang

Huaichun Jiang — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:48:15 +0000

The Arabs are not so bad if proper policies are implemented. We need to divide the Arabs into two parts, one is to like westerners and another is to hate westerners. We need to train those who like westerners to fight those who hate westerners. In this case, only a little sacrifice can win the whole Arabs.
Meanwhile, I should say that I am not a communist, it is impossible for me to be a Chinese leader. If the communist leadership is overthrown, I can have the opportunity to be a Chinese leader, if I am a Chinese leader, I will follow the order of NATO, Russia, India, Japan and Australia who protect me.

Comment on Security in the Gulf and the Mediterranean matters to NATO by Provincial View

Provincial View — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:43:45 +0000

I finnaly see some sense in NATO’s strategycal intent! Bravissimo!

Comment on Security in the Gulf and the Mediterranean matters to NATO by Provincial View

Provincial View — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:38:44 +0000

Yes, the implication of ‘good’ arab states in conflict zones, as hard as Afghanistan, is verry important. I wrote about that a few months back on another video posted here… You must use people that resembles the people you are fighting! You don’t need cocky generals, whom are strangers in the picture… You need good soldiers that share the background with the enemy!

Comment on Military is no longer the complete answer by Provincial View

Provincial View — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:28:04 +0000

Afghanistan as a UN Protectorate? Remember Srebrenica? Remember Rwandan Genocide?

Comment on Military is no longer the complete answer by Provincial View

Provincial View — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:19:23 +0000

You got It! I subscribe to your view 100%!

Comment on Military is no longer the complete answer by KH Eisler

KH Eisler — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:02:16 +0000

better no considerations cis – russia to become member of nato. a certain pfp treaty but with strict borders to strategic tasks should take place. joint operations eg africa are thinkable.
don`t forget nat gas breaks, cwho just wants their own advantagesivil rights, salt, org crime and different justifacation, iran position = quet deliveries eg nuclear fuel. is rusia a real reliable partner or will it be in middle run.
nato should more restrivtive with further members – no ukraine or other countries own advantages.
I am sure nato is glad tohave GS R as head of organisation
kh eisler

Comment on Military is no longer the complete answer by Dieter Stanzeleit

Dieter Stanzeleit — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:04:29 +0000

Concerning further development of the NATO is would like to support the proposal of Mr. Volker Rühe to include also Russia in NATO. Of course such a significant step has to be well prepared, mainly under the view of a common win-win aspect. Therefore I would like to propose to establish a common commission with Russia and NATO which – maybe under a designed timeframe – discuss and clarify the variety of all aspects and consequences of Russian NATO-membership. To start this might become a signal to open similar contacts also with other states.
It would be wise to include the ideas and results of such kind of possible-membership-options into the plans for wider NATO military and non- military strategies for the future.
Dieter Stanzleit

Comment on Military is no longer the complete answer by LethaChristina

LethaChristina — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:11 +0000

Mr. Rasmussen, in another article, wrote of the critical need to impliment the use of more women in these conflicts–since they are the ultimate “loosers” in them. He is so extremely correct, theologically (he wasn’t speaking in those terms, of course). St. Edith Stein (Sr. Teresa Benedicta of the Cross, O.C.D.), the greatest woman mind of the twentieth century/phenemonologist/German philosopher–professor and martyred at Aschwisch because she was a Jew… states in one of her books that it is “woman who will do final battle with the serpent and conquer it through maternal LOVE through the Holy Spirit.” She was, of course, referring to the Blessed Mother–but that means WOMAN and maternal LOVE in modern and practical terms.

Comment on Military is no longer the complete answer by Anders Holm

Anders Holm — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:33:37 +0000

Finally a leader that have realised the truth… A shame that we lost you as a primeminister in Denmark!

Comment on Military is no longer the complete answer by s anand, Ph.D scholar

s anand, Ph.D scholar — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 09:07:17 +0000

we fully agree with the Secretary General’s views. Afghanistan has become a battleground for many powers in the last 40 years. There are other failed states/failing nations in the pipelines such as Yemen/Somalia/sudan/Pakistan, etc. Let nation-building in Afghanistan be a test case for other states. The only way to ensure non-interference of other states in Afganistan would be to make that country a Protectorate of UN for at least 10 years during which Afghan Military and Civil Bureacracy could be well-trained and simultaneously the living standards of Afghan people could also be improved paving way for a stable democracy.
anand